ccannard no eero team is just a joke. LOL

TimDroz You have to open up the ports needed for the remote camera. Most people set the camera to a port different than the camera default and then map the external port to the internal port. Its under Settings>Advanced>Reservations & Port Forwarding. You will also have to manually update the DNS service or run the app on a computer or device on your network instead of depending on the router to keep the external IP mapping current. It does not look like Eero is ever going to add the ability to connect to the dynamic DNS services directly.

Volzalum Yes, I've done this (port forwarding), the problem is that as my public-facing IP address changes, I lose access to the camera system.  That's what the DDNS is for - so I can create a hostname and keep that hostname pointed at the right IP address whenever it changes.  My old router had this capability built in.  Before that, I was able to use a client program to update the host record, but that client doesn't seem to be able to reach the internet anymore, I suspect that it's being blocked by Eero Secure.  I can try to figure out how to whitelist it, but the overall simpler and better solution would just be to have this as a feature in the router, like a great many other routers do.

TimDroz My NoIP reaches through fine to the internet as a client on my Macs, but I am not using Eero secure. And yes, this entire topic is a feature request to add the basic DDNS provider connection at the router level like most every other router on the market. I too would very much like the capability so I could more easily manage my DDNS changes.

My directions were how I am able to access my remote camera using an Eero and using the NoIp client on my Macs.

Volzalum thanks.  I am able to access the camera, as long as the app on my phone is pointed at the right IP address since the DDNS client doesn't seem to be working for me.  I voted and commented here because usually the way these things work is once there's a large enough demand for a feature, they'll prioritize development, so the more people that say they want a feature, the more likely they are to put it in the pipeline.

Skyedog This thread is an official feature request, but since the discussion thread was started four years ago and people are still asking for it today, it should be clear it's not yet implemented.  I can't say whether it's on their roadmap or not, but I somehow doubt it.

chandlervdw Well, I believed I saw this suggestion 4 years ago, and Eero still not adding this feature. I believed they just don't care about our voice and will not act on that. I gave up already.

chandlervdw I gave up, too. I needed a NAS, so I’m using my Synology NAS to take care of dynamic DNS. It’s a shame, since this is a feature available in less sophisticated and cheaper network hardware.